LT
EventEXPO-26DemoAI-planned

Technology Expo Sydney

Two-day trade expo bringing Australian deep-tech, advanced manufacturing and AI companies together with regional buyers at ICC Sydney.

At risk53

Project health

MNDOSWKATF
Owner
Mai Nguyen
Target
16 Oct 2026 · in 5 weeks
Budget
AU$388K of AU$780K
Progress
3/7 milestones
Assigned
5 people

Project Truth

What is actually happening, computed from the project record. Activity and readiness are measured separately, because they are not the same thing.

Computed
53

Project health

53 / 100

At 72% of elapsed time

High confidence

Blockers
11
Decisions waiting
2
Budget variance
+6.8

78% of budget committed at 72% of the schedule

Critical dependencies
1

Last material change

Raised schedule risk — Public launch campaign live Project Doctor, 3 days ago

Next critical action

Approve the varied production scope

Each day this waits is a day added to the delivery date, because the work behind it cannot start in parallel.

Go there

Where this came from

Calculated today · 78% of sources current

  • Tasks2 days old20 tasks, last changed 2 days ago.
  • Decisions3 days old4 decisions, last changed 3 days ago.
  • Deliverables2 days old5 deliverables, last changed 2 days ago.
  • Outcomes4 days old2 outcomes, last changed 4 days ago.
  • Readiness gates3 days old8 gates, last changed 3 days ago.
  • Execution historycurrent57 recorded events, last changed today.
  • BudgetcurrentEntered manually. Last touched 1 day ago. No finance system is connected.
  • Evidence8 days old5 items, last changed 8 days ago.
  • Vendor statusunverified3 suppliers recorded from what was entered here. Nothing has been confirmed with the suppliers themselves.

Evidence has not changed in over a week. Treat anything derived from it as a position rather than a current fact.

Vendor status is recorded from what was entered here and has not been confirmed with the source. The product does not assume it.

Activity is not readiness

Five measures from different evidence. The gap between the first and the rest is what tells you whether this project is genuinely moving.

Execution progress

56%

11 of 20 tasks complete, weighted by estimated effort

High confidence

Deliverable readiness

35%

1 of 5 deliverables accepted; the rest measured on acceptance criteria met

High confidence

Launch readiness

36%

1 of 8 readiness gates cleared under the event profile, with 0 of 3 launch-blocking deliverables accepted

High confidence

Outcome readiness

27%

2 of 2 outcomes have linked deliverables; 0 assessed on track

Low confidence · not known: 1 outcome has no measured current value

Commercial readiness

62%

2 opportunities, 1 approved pack, 3 live deals

High confidence

Activity

11 of 20 tasks

9 still open

Output

1 of 5 deliverables accepted

3 launch-blocking outputs outstanding

Outcome

0 of 2 on track

1 have a measured value

What is blocked (11)

Anything that would stop this project shipping today.

  • Production build (stage, rigging, AV)

    Blocked, and required before this project can ship.

    deliverable
  • Buyer matching programme

    3 of 4 acceptance criteria still to meet.

    deliverable
  • Public launch campaign

    Blocked, and required before this project can ship.

    deliverable
  • Approve the varied production scope

    Waiting 4 days on a critical decision.

    decision
  • Approve the EVENT5D public experience for launch

    Waiting 3 days on a high decision.

    decision
  • Sign production supplier master agreement

    Blocked for 6 days.

    task
  • Sign production supplier master agreement

    Waiting on an approval before it can complete.

    approval
  • Approve EVENT5D public experience draft

    Waiting on an approval before it can complete.

    approval
  • Production gate

    Production is blocked — Supplier master agreement is unsigned, so the build cannot be scheduled. Nothing ships until it clears. Mai Nguyen owns it.

    gate
  • Operations gate

    In progress, but no deliverable is linked to it, so its progress is a stated position rather than a measured one.

    gate
  • Speakers gate

    In progress, but no deliverable is linked to it, so its progress is a stated position rather than a measured one.

    gate

What will go wrong

Rule-based forecasts from current evidence. There is no historical baseline across projects, so these are arithmetic you can check, not probabilities.

  • High risk· Moderate confidence

    Sign production supplier master agreement has been blocked for 6 days

    Why

    • Blocked since 2 Sept
    • On the critical path, so nothing behind it can start
    • Waiting on an approval

    Impact

    Every day blocked is a day added to the delivery date.

    Likely delay 68 days

    How that figure was arrived at

    On the critical path, so the 6 days blocked pass straight through to the finish date. The upper figure allows for restart time.

    Rule-based. Derived from the dependency graph and how long the item has been stopped.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.Get the approval, or remove the approval requirement if it is not warranted
    2. 2.Start downstream work that does not strictly need this finished

    Owner — Mai Nguyen

  • High risk· High confidence

    Approve the varied production scope has been waiting 4 days

    Why

    • Critical impact
    • 2 work items cannot proceed without it

    Impact

    1 milestone depend on it.

    Likely delay 47 days

    How that figure was arrived at

    The 4 days already spent waiting are lost from the schedule. The upper figure allows for restarting the 2 blocked items.

    Observed directly. The decision has an owner, a request date and a list of what it is holding up.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.A recommendation is prepared — review it and decide
    2. 2.If it cannot be decided this week, say so explicitly and reschedule the work behind it

    Owner — Anthony Bui

  • High risk· High confidence

    Tom Ferreira holds 2 of 2 critical-path items

    Why

    • 100% of the remaining critical path sits with one person
    • 9 items are open across the project

    Impact

    If that person is unavailable, the critical path stops entirely. There is no parallel route.

    Observed directly from assignment and the dependency graph.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.Move at least one critical-path item to another owner
    2. 2.Agree cover for that person before the next delivery increment

    Owner — Mai Nguyen

  • High risk· Low confidence

    Acceptance window is tight on 3 launch-blocking deliverables

    Why

    • 9 acceptance criteria are still unmet across launch-blocking deliverables
    • The earliest is already 3 days past its date

    Impact

    Deliverables get accepted under time pressure, or the launch moves.

    Likely delay 913 days

    How that figure was arrived at

    Counting roughly one working day per unmet acceptance criterion, 9 criteria need about 9 days and there are 0. This is a rule of thumb, not a measurement.

    Rule-based, using one day per unmet acceptance criterion. Replace with measured effort once deliverable work is estimated.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.Review acceptance criteria and drop any that are not genuinely required for launch
    2. 2.Start acceptance on the criteria that can be met now rather than at the end

    Owner — Mai Nguyen

  • Medium risk· Moderate confidence

    Delivery date at risk by 1–10 days

    Why

    • About 67 hours of work remain against roughly 12 hours a week of recent throughput
    • 1 item is blocked, the longest for 6 days
    • 2 unmade decisions of high or critical impact
    • 1 milestone is already past due

    Impact

    Target date is 38 days away. 4 milestones remain.

    Likely delay 110 days

    How that figure was arrived at

    67 hours of work remain. Recent throughput is about 12 hours a week, from 5 tasks completed in the last 28 days as recorded in the execution log. At that rate the work needs about 5.6 weeks and there are 5.4 weeks left. The upper figure assumes throughput drops by a quarter.

    Rule-based. There is no historical baseline across projects, so this is arithmetic on current work rather than a statistical prediction. Throughput comes from 5 completion events recorded over 28 days.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.Clear the 2 decisions waiting — they cost nothing to make and are holding work
    2. 2.Unblock or reassign the 1 stopped item
    3. 3.Freeze non-critical scope so remaining throughput goes to the critical path

    Owner — Mai Nguyen

  • Medium risk· High confidence

    Approve the EVENT5D public experience for launch has been waiting 3 days

    Why

    • High impact
    • 2 work items cannot proceed without it

    Impact

    1 milestone depend on it.

    Likely delay 36 days

    How that figure was arrived at

    The 3 days already spent waiting are lost from the schedule. The upper figure allows for restarting the 2 blocked items.

    Observed directly. The decision has an owner, a request date and a list of what it is holding up.

    Recommended intervention

    1. 1.A recommendation is prepared — review it and decide
    2. 2.If it cannot be decided this week, say so explicitly and reschedule the work behind it

    Owner — Kenji Arai

What readiness gate is preventing delivery

Judged under the event profile — this project's own definition of ready, not a universal one.

Production

Production is blocked — Supplier master agreement is unsigned, so the build cannot be scheduled. Nothing ships until it clears. Mai Nguyen owns it.

  • Venue100
  • Production10
  • Speakers45
  • Sponsors45
  • Guests25
  • Media25
  • Operations45
  • EVENT5D45

What actual execution history shows

Read from the append-only event log — when work started, finished and sat blocked — rather than from when records were last touched.

5 items completed in the last 28 days, about 12 hours a week.

Throughput
12hper week

5 items completed, 48h recorded

Cycle time
8.2days, median

Across 5 items, longest 8.2 days

Time lost to blocking
6.1days

1 block still open, the longest 6.1 days

Decision latency

2 decisions have a recorded raise and resolve, below the 3 needed to state a typical time.

Completion trend

Slowing

3 items in the first half of the window against 2 in the second. Comparison is between the two halves only, not against other projects.

Critical-path movement

2 of 2 items moved

2 critical-path items changed state in the last 28 days, but none completed.

Data basis

57 recorded events · window of the last 28 days · sample of 5 completions.

How health was calculated

Pulling this down

  • One person holds 100% of open critical-path work20
  • Production gate is not cleared, with 11 open blockers in total36
  • 2 decisions waiting, the oldest for 4 days44
  • 1 of 2 critical-path items are blocked46
  • 27% outcome readiness at 72% of elapsed time46
  • 35% of outputs ready at 72% of elapsed time48
  • 2 awaiting approval48
  • 1 blocked, the longest for 6 days — 6.1 days lost to blocking in the last 2860
  • About 5.6 weeks of work against 5.4 weeks remaining, at measured throughput97

All factors

  • Critical path46 · weight 13%

    1 of 2 critical-path items are blocked

  • Deadline pressure97 · weight 14%

    About 5.6 weeks of work against 5.4 weeks remaining, at measured throughput

  • Blocked work60 · weight 12%

    1 blocked, the longest for 6 days — 6.1 days lost to blocking in the last 28

  • Decision latency44 · weight 12%

    2 decisions waiting, the oldest for 4 days

  • Deliverable readiness48 · weight 13%

    35% of outputs ready at 72% of elapsed time

  • Launch readiness36 · weight 13%

    Production gate is not cleared, with 11 open blockers in total

  • Outcome confidence46 · weight 9%

    27% outcome readiness at 72% of elapsed time

  • Resource concentration20 · weight 6%

    One person holds 100% of open critical-path work

  • Approval latency48 · weight 5%

    2 awaiting approval

  • Budget variance86 · weight 3%

    78% of budget committed at 72% of the schedule

Decisions waiting

Open queue
  • Approve the varied production scopeToday

    Anthony Bui · waiting 4 days

    1. Approve the varied production scope
    2. Sign production supplier master agreement
    3. Finalise run of show with venue operations
    4. Production build complete
    5. Qualified export pipeline created for exhibitors

    2 work items1 milestone2 launch-blocking deliverablesOn the critical path

    Earliest milestone affected: Production build complete (8 Oct)

  • Approve the EVENT5D public experience for launchin 2 days

    Kenji Arai · waiting 3 days

    1. Approve the EVENT5D public experience for launch
    2. Approve EVENT5D public experience draft
    3. Brief media partners on launch campaign
    4. Public launch campaign live
    5. The 2026 edition covers its own cost

    2 work items1 milestone1 launch-blocking deliverable

    Earliest milestone affected: Public launch campaign live (5 Sept)

Are we moving toward the outcome?

Every outcome, the outputs that serve it, and how far along they actually are.

    Establish an annual expo that pays for itself and generates a measurable export pipeline.

    Qualified export pipeline created for exhibitors

    42%

    in 6 weeks

    How we would know
    150 qualified buyer introductions logged and attributed
    Where it stands
    Not measured yet
    • Buyer matching programme1/4 criterialaunch-blocking
    • Exhibitor floor plan3/3 criteria
    • Post-event attribution report0/3 criteria

    Establish an annual expo that pays for itself and generates a measurable export pipeline.

    The 2026 edition covers its own cost

    25%

    in 4 weeks

    How we would know
    AU$400K sponsorship committed against AU$780K planned cost
    Where it stands
    AU$140K committed, AU$85K in proposal
    • Production build (stage, rigging, AV)1/4 criterialaunch-blocking
    • Public launch campaign1/4 criterialaunch-blocking

Every figure on this page is computed from the project record. Budget planned AU$780K, committed AU$612K, spent AU$388K.

Command

Search ProjectHub or start something new